Electronic Securities Under the Electronic Securities Act
Electronic securities let German issuers replace paper certificates with entries in a central register or a crypto securities register. This guide explains how the Electronic Securities Act works, how electronic bonds, fund units and shares are transferred, the licensing of register keepers and why tokenised securities fall outside MiCAR.

Key takeaways
- The eWpG allows bonds, registered shares and certain bearer shares to be issued without certificates.
- Central registers are kept by a CSD or authorised custodian; crypto registers on tamper-proof systems.
- Keeping a crypto securities register requires a BaFin licence under the KWG.
- Ownership passes by re-registration; the register enjoys public faith (§§ 25, 26 eWpG).
- Electronic securities are financial instruments and outside the MiCAR regime.
What electronic securities are under German law
Electronic securities are securities issued without a paper certificate, by entering them in an electronic securities register. The legal basis is the Electronic Securities Act (Gesetz über elektronische Wertpapiere, eWpG), introduced in 2021.
Until then, German law required every security to be embodied in a document, usually a global certificate deposited with Clearstream Banking AG in Frankfurt. Under the eWpG, an issuer can instead make an entry in an electronic register, and the electronic security has the same legal effect as one issued by certificate (§ 2(1), (2) eWpG). It is treated as a thing (Sache) for the purposes of the Civil Code (§ 2(3) eWpG), so the familiar rules on ownership and good-faith acquisition can apply.
The Act covers bearer bonds, registered shares and bearer shares entered in a central register (§ 1 eWpG). Fund units can be issued electronically under a separate rule in the Capital Investment Code (§ 95(1) KAGB). The regime therefore now covers the main capital market instruments of German issuers, although uptake differs considerably between bonds, fund units and shares.

Central registers and crypto securities registers
The eWpG distinguishes two kinds of electronic securities register (§ 4(1) eWpG). A central register can be kept by a central securities depository or by a custodian bank that the issuer has expressly authorised in text form (§ 12(2) eWpG). Securities in a central register maintained by a CSD, with the CSD entered as holder, are settled through the existing book-entry system just like certificated securities (§ 12(3) eWpG). This is the route chosen by most institutional bond and fund issuers that wanted to digitise without changing settlement infrastructure.
A crypto securities register must be kept on a tamper-proof recording system in which data are logged in chronological order and protected against unauthorised deletion and later alteration (§ 16(1) eWpG), in practice a distributed ledger. The register keeper is the person the issuer names to holders; if nobody is named, the issuer is the register keeper (§ 16(2) eWpG). Keeping a crypto securities register is a regulated financial service requiring a BaFin licence (§ 1(1a) sentence 2 no. 8 KWG). Crypto securities allow issuance and transfer on a blockchain while remaining securities under German civil law.
| Feature | Central register securities | Crypto securities |
|---|---|---|
| Register keeper | Central securities depository or authorised custodian (§ 12 eWpG) | Named register keeper or the issuer (§ 16 eWpG); licence needed |
| Technology | Any reliable register system | Tamper-proof recording system, typically distributed ledger |
| Settlement | Book-entry settlement via the CSD where the CSD is holder | Transfer by re-registration in the crypto register |
| Instruments | Bonds, registered shares, bearer shares, fund units | Bonds, registered shares, fund units (electronic fund units under the KAGB) |
| Supervision of register | Notification to BaFin before operation (§ 12(4) eWpG) | Licensed financial service under the KWG |
Transfer and good-faith acquisition of electronic securities
Dispositions over an electronic security require an entry or re-registration in the register to be effective (§ 24 eWpG). Ownership passes when the security is re-registered to the acquirer on the instruction of the entitled person and both agree that ownership should pass; until re-registration, the transferor keeps ownership (§ 25(1) eWpG). The right under the security passes with the transfer of ownership. For electronic shares with transfer restrictions under the articles, the register keeper may only re-register after the company has consented, and registered shares in electronic form cannot be transferred by endorsement (§ 25(3) eWpG).
The register enjoys public faith. In favour of a person who is entered in the register on the basis of a legal transaction, the content of the register is deemed complete and correct and the holder is deemed to be the entitled person, unless the acquirer knows otherwise or is unaware due to gross negligence (§ 26 eWpG). Restrictions on disposal are effective against an acquirer only if they are entered in the register or known to the acquirer. This gives electronic securities a level of transferability comparable to certificated bearer securities.
Collective and individual entries
An issuer may enter a CSD or a custodian as holder for the whole issue (collective entry), or individual investors as holders (individual entry) (§ 8(1) eWpG). Collective entries fit the existing custody chain, while individual entries allow direct holding on a ledger. Holders may convert individual entries into a collective entry unless the terms or articles exclude it (§ 8(2) eWpG). Investors have no right to receive individual paper certificates unless the terms or articles expressly provide for it (§ 6(1) eWpG).
Issue terms, register duties and liability
Before an electronic security is entered, the issuer must deposit the issue terms with the register keeper as a durable electronic document that anyone can access directly and repeatedly (§ 5(1) eWpG). If the entry is not made within three months, the register keeper deletes the deposited terms. Later amendments to the terms must themselves be deposited to become effective, and the register keeper must ensure that the terms change only by law, legal transaction, court decision or enforceable administrative act (§ 5(2), (3) eWpG). For electronic shares, the articles of association are not deposited (§ 5(5) eWpG).
The register keeper must keep the register so that the confidentiality, integrity and authenticity of the data are guaranteed and the register always reflects the actual legal position. It is liable to the entitled person for damage caused by incorrect register keeping unless it is not responsible for the error, and for data loss or unauthorised changes if it has not taken the necessary technical and organisational measures (§ 7(2), (3) eWpG). Keeping a register is not in itself custody business under the Securities Custody Act (§ 7(4) eWpG).
For crypto securities, the issuer carries its own responsibility for the integrity and authenticity of the securities. It is liable for damage caused by the register keeper only if it did not exercise due care in selecting it (§ 21(1) eWpG). If the requirements for the register can no longer be met, the issuer must remedy the situation within a reasonable time, and BaFin can require it to move the crypto securities to another register (§ 21(2) eWpG).
A voluntary move to another register needs the consent of all holders or of BaFin (§ 22 eWpG). Payments on electronic bonds are owed only against an instruction to re-register the bond to the issuer on proof of payment (§ 29(1) eWpG), which replaces the presentation of a paper certificate.
The extension of electronic securities to shares
The eWpG originally covered only bearer bonds, with electronic fund units provided for in the KAGB. A later reform extended it to shares: registered shares can now be issued as central register shares or as crypto shares, while bearer shares are possible only in a central register (§ 1 eWpG). The issuer can mandate the register keeper to keep the share register under the Stock Corporation Act as well (§ 30a eWpG). For electronic shares, the articles of association take the place of the issue terms in many provisions, for example on the right to paper certificates and on replacing electronic with certificated shares (§ 6 eWpG).
For start-ups and smaller stock corporations, crypto shares can simplify the shareholder register, employee participation programmes and secondary transfers. For listed companies, central register shares held through the CSD are the practical route. Because shareholder rights, notifications and general meeting procedures continue to follow the Stock Corporation Act, issuers should map the full lifecycle, from issuance to dividends, capital measures and squeeze-outs, before choosing an electronic format. Our page on corporate governance for GmbH, AG and SE explains the general framework.
Before choosing crypto securities, check who will act as register keeper, whether it holds the required BaFin licence, how the issuer can change the register keeper or move the securities to another register, and whether target investors' custodians can hold crypto securities. Many institutional investors can only hold assets through their existing custody chain, which favours central register securities.
Regulatory classification: securities, not MiCAR crypto-assets
Electronic securities are financial instruments. Their public offer is subject to the Prospectus Regulation, their trading to MiFID II and the Market Abuse Regulation, and their custody to the rules on custody business. They are excluded from MiCAR, which covers crypto-assets that are not financial instruments; see our insight on MiCAR CASP authorisation. This distinction matters for tokenisation projects: a token representing a bond or share is generally a security, and issuers cannot rely on the lighter MiCAR white paper regime.
Crypto securities may also be admitted to DLT market infrastructures under the EU DLT Pilot Regime, which allows trading and settlement of tokenised financial instruments on distributed ledgers under certain exemptions. Conflict-of-laws rules in the eWpG determine which law governs rights in an electronic security: generally the law of the state supervising the register keeper, and where there is no supervision, the law of the register keeper's seat or the issuer's seat (§ 32 eWpG). Cross-border token issuances should take this into account. For bond issues, the Bond Act also applies to electronic bonds, including majority decisions by holders, discussed in our insight on bondholder votes under the SchVG.
Practical use cases for electronic securities
- Digital bonds: central register bonds and crypto bonds can shorten issuance processes, reduce documentation and settlement costs and allow smaller denominations.
- Fund units: electronic fund units under § 95 KAGB enable digital distribution and, for crypto fund units, direct holding on a ledger.
- Employee and start-up equity: crypto shares can make cap table management and transfers more efficient for unlisted stock corporations.
- Collateral and repo: electronic securities can be used as collateral, with pledges requiring entry in the register under § 24 eWpG.
Despite these advantages, market adoption depends on infrastructure, investor acceptance and tax and accounting treatment. Issuers should run a pilot with a limited investor base before committing a full programme, and should involve their paying agent, custodians and auditors early so that operational processes are tested end to end. Our page on capital markets covers wider issuance questions.
How TRW & Co helps
We advise issuers, banks, register keepers, fintechs and investors on electronic securities in Germany. We structure electronic bond, share and fund unit issues, draft issue terms and articles of association, assess licensing requirements for crypto securities register keeping and custody, and review platform documentation and DLT arrangements. We also advise on the interaction with prospectus law, MiFID II, MiCAR and the Bond Act, and on the corporate law steps for electronic shares. This page is general information, not legal advice. To discuss a project, please contact us.
Frequently asked questions
Are electronic securities legally equivalent to paper securities?
Yes. Unless the eWpG provides otherwise, an electronic security has the same legal effect as a security issued by certificate (§ 2(2) eWpG), and it is treated as a thing within the meaning of the Civil Code (§ 2(3) eWpG). Investors have no right to individual certificates unless the issue terms or articles provide for it.
What is the difference between a central register and a crypto securities register?
A central register is kept by a central securities depository or an authorised custodian, and securities entered with a CSD as holder are settled through the normal book-entry system. A crypto securities register is kept on a tamper-proof recording system such as a distributed ledger by a named register keeper, which needs a BaFin licence.
Can a GmbH issue electronic shares?
No. The eWpG covers bearer bonds and shares of stock corporations, together with electronic fund units under the KAGB. Shares in a GmbH are not securities, and their transfer still requires a notarial deed under § 15 GmbHG. Companies that want tokenised equity therefore often consider the stock corporation form.
Do crypto securities fall under MiCAR?
No. Electronic securities, including crypto securities, are financial instruments and are therefore excluded from MiCAR. Their offering, trading and custody are governed by securities law, including the Prospectus Regulation, MiFID II and the Market Abuse Regulation, and by the licensing rules of the KWG and the WpIG.
Sources
General information only, not legal advice. References to statutes, courts and authorities describe published law and practice at the date shown.


